Loading...
Vietnam Geography App
Loading...
Vietnam Geography App
Think critically: spot bad arguments! Common logical fallacies: (1) Ad Hominem (attack person not argument: You support solar energy? You drive gas car hypocrite! = irrelevant!), (2) Straw Man (misrepresent argument weaker version: They want bike lanes?
Want ban ALL cars city! = exaggeration!), (3) False Dilemma (only 2 options when more exist: Either economic growth OR environment, choose! = false binary!), (4) Appeal to Authority (expert opinion wrong field: Celebrity doctor sells diet pills authority medicine NOT nutrition!), (5) Bandwagon (popular = correct: Everyone uses Facebook, must be safe! = popularity ≠ truth!), (6) Slippery Slope (small step leads disaster: Allow gay marriage, next people marry pets! = unproven chain!), (7) Hasty Generalization (few examples → broad conclusion: Two Vietnamese I met rude, all Vietnamese must be rude! = sample size tiny!), (8) Post Hoc (correlation = causation: Ice cream sales up, crime up = ice cream causes crime? No, summer causes both!), (9) Appeal to Tradition (old = good: We've always done it this way, don't change! = tradition ≠ optimal!), (10) Red Herring (irrelevant distraction: Climate change serious? What about poverty! = change subject avoid!).
Vietnam scenarios realistic: (1) Education debate (Tiger mom: Study 12 hours/day or you'll fail life! = false dilemma!), (2) Food safety (Organic farmer: Big Agriculture wants poison you! = ad hominem + conspiracy!), (3) Traffic (Motorbike ban will solve congestion! = oversimplification!), (4) Technology (Smartphones make youth lazy, we had none and successful! = appeal to tradition + hasty generalization!). Critical thinking steps: (1) Identify claim (what exactly argued?), (2) Examine evidence (facts or opinions? sources credible?), (3) Spot assumptions (unstated beliefs?), (4) Check logic (conclusion follow premises?), (5) Consider alternatives (other explanations? counterexamples?). Benefits: (1) Avoid manipulation (ads, politicians, scams use fallacies!), (2) Better decisions (evaluate arguments merit not emotion!), (3) Stronger arguments (make yours logically sound!), (4) Media literacy (fake news often fallacious!).
Skills apply: debates, essays, business proposals, everyday discussions. Essential 21st century!
• Sử dụng logic để giải các bài toán
• Kéo thả để sắp xếp các phần tử
• Hoàn thành càng nhanh càng nhiều điểm
Identify common fallacies: Ad Hominem, Straw Man, False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, Slippery Slope, Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc, Appeal to Tradition, Red Herring
Apply critical thinking steps: identify claim, examine evidence, spot assumptions, check logic, consider alternatives
Analyze Vietnam contexts: education debates, food safety, traffic policy, technology arguments with cultural awareness
Avoid personal fallacies: steelman arguments, quantify claims, separate person from idea, acknowledge uncertainty, seek disconfirming evidence
Explore applications: business strategy, law, journalism, education, tech with transferable critical thinking skills
Thực hành nhận biết logical fallacies và phân tích arguments trong real-world scenarios
Apply critical thinking skills để evaluate solutions và avoid biased reasoning
Identify weak arguments và improve persuasion techniques in communication
💡 Hoàn thành các bài học này để hiểu sâu hơn về chủ đề trong Interactive Practice
Thêm Interactive Practice sẽ được cập nhật sớm!